🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.